1. Trump Announces a Major Military Strike
Former U.S. President Donald Trump announced that the United States had carried out what he described as a “very successful attack” on three Iranian nuclear facilities. Framing the operation as a turning point, Trump portrayed the strike as a decisive show of strength and resolve. In a dramatic statement, he declared the action a “HISTORIC MOMENT FOR THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ISRAEL, AND THE WORLD,” signaling that the move was meant to reshape the strategic balance and send a powerful message to America’s adversaries and allies alike.
2. Iran Strongly Condemns the Attacks
Iran swiftly condemned the strikes, with Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi issuing a stern warning that Tehran “reserves all options” in response. He denounced the attack on what he described as Iran’s peaceful nuclear installations, calling it a “grave violation” of the United Nations Charter, international law, and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). His remarks underscored Iran’s view that the strikes were not only an act of aggression, but also a serious threat to the international legal framework governing nuclear activity and global security.
3. Supporters and Critics React Worldwide
Reactions from global leaders were swift and deeply divided. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praised the move, hailing Trump’s decision as bold and historic, and stating that it would “change history.” In stark contrast, China condemned the strikes, arguing that they seriously violate the United Nations Charter and undermine international stability.
Meanwhile, United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres voiced grave concern, warning that the escalation could lead to “catastrophic consequences” if diplomacy fails. His remarks highlighted fears that the situation could spiral beyond control without immediate efforts to restore dialogue and restraint.
4. Global Calls for Calm and De-Escalation
Across Europe, the Middle East, Asia, and Latin America, leaders urged restraint and a return to diplomatic engagement. Responses reflected a wide spectrum of concern: Saudi Arabia expressed “great concern” over the potential for further escalation, while Venezuela denounced the action as “U.S. military aggression.”
Adding a moral and humanitarian voice to the debate, Pope Leo appealed for peace, cautioning that the world must avoid plunging into an “irreparable abyss.” His message echoed a broader global anxiety—that without careful diplomacy and compromise, the conflict could destabilize regions far beyond the immediate crisis.
