The crisp morning air of Washington, D.C. bit with winter’s edge, but inside the federal courthouse, the atmosphere was even colder. What was expected to be a routine hearing had stirred unexpected interest—journalists, political staffers, and seasoned operatives filled the room, all sensing something unusual in the air.
Caroline Leavitt, President Trump’s press secretary, entered with practiced composure but immediately felt the charged tension. At the bench sat Chief Justice John Roberts, his face a mask of neutrality.
Without warning or explanation, Roberts spoke:
“The defendant has violated the Federal Communications Act. A fine of $50,000 is hereby imposed.”
No arguments. No presentation of evidence. Just a jarring verdict delivered into a stunned silence.
Leavitt rose to her feet, her voice steady but urgent:
“Your Honor, we haven’t even begun. I respectfully request the opportunity to present my defense.”
Chief Justice Roberts has long maintained that courts exist to check the excesses of Congress and the Executive Branch. But today’s proceedings raised more questions than answers.
Read more at The Washington Times.
